Gallery
About
Hi HN,For the last ~15 years I've worked on embedding web browsers into Java and .NET desktop apps (JxBrowser, DotNetBrowser). Over time, I watched many teams move from embedding web views into native apps, to building full desktop apps with frameworks like Electron and Tauri.Both are useful, but in practice I kept running into several problems.With Electron, beyond the larger app footprint, I often ran into: - lack of type-safe IPC - no source code protection - weak support for the modern web stack Tauri solves some problems (like app size), but introduces others: - different WebViews across platforms → inconsistent behavior - requires Rust + JS instead of a single stack So we built MōBrowser, a framework for building desktop apps with TypeScript, Node.js, and Chromium.Some of the things we focused on: - typed IPC using Protobuf + code generation (RPC-style communication instead of string channels) - consistent rendering and behavior across different platforms - Node.js runtime - built-in packaging, updates, and scaffolding - source code protection - small delta auto-updates The goal is to let web developers ship desktop apps with a web stack they already know and fewer cross-platform surprises.I'd especially love feedback from people who have built production apps with Electron or Tauri.Happy to answer any questions.
Comments (3)
how does pricing work compared to electron for smaller teams?
Competing with Tauri or targeting Electron refugees?
that macron is gonna murder your discoverability
Related Products
Free Currency Converter API
Limestone Digital
AI-Powered Software Development, Engineering Team Augmentation,
ChangeSpec
MobileGym: A Verifiable and Highly Parallel Simulation Platform for Mobile GUI A
IronFile - Completely Customizable
Turnkey Industrial SaaS Platform (80k+ LOC) • 12 Enterprise Connectors
Technologies.lat
Quality Assurance for software that is here for the long run
ComingUp